[cmamad id=”18540″ align=”center” tabid=”display-desktop” mobid=”display-desktop” stg=””]
The wrong kind of bread can create powerful addictions and allergies that destroy the gut… And they do it so quietly that no man can tell he’s sick… Here’s what you need to know…
(The gut-destroying addictive quality of these common foods KILLS men’s erections and destroys their health…)
———Important Message———-
THIS happened to me just last night…
There I was… hanging out at my local bar… nodding my head to the music…. The place was packed.
I wasn’t even drinking alcohol, but I’ve been smiling all night.
All of a sudden a young girl starts leaning on me. Then she turns her back to me and starts backing into my hip…
That’s when I realized this is how girls dance. She wanted me. And we were now grinding against each other.
As we danced to the rest of the song, I wondered…
Am I gonna be able to get an erection? At least, can I feel myself twitch down there?
And my penis wasn’t even twitching… I was so afraid I would not be able to perform when it came time to have sex…
Then I remembered this solo technique my friend told me about… He said it gets you an erection in a matter of seconds when you need it most…
I thought about that some more… and I realized this technique would work perfectly for me tonight.
And so, I took the girl home, used this solo technique for instant erections… and had the best sex ever. Go here now to learn about the technique I used…
—————-
These simple foods become powerfully addictive
In explaining why people appear addicted to certain foods, you’ll often hear some naturopaths say this is because they’re “allergic” to it.
“Cigarette smoking is a good example of allergy/addiction syndrome. The first cigarette ever smoked produces dizziness, nausea, and a sore throat feeling…”
As with coffee and tobacco, that explanation is complete and utter bullshit in most cases…
Yet it can actually happen with some types of foods.
Many people are either total believers of this idea or universal deniers of it.
Some use specific examples to discredit the entire scheme.
And attacking the idea is quite easy to do: The addiction-allergy idea actually sprang out of Alcoholics Anonymous in the ’70s.
[cmamad id=”18541″ align=”center” tabid=”display-desktop” mobid=”display-desktop” stg=””]
Alcoholics Anonymous is something of a cult.
They actually tell people that “alcoholism is a disease,” literally – and that it is a disease they will always have.
This sounds suspiciously similar to the “original sin” tenet of Christianity – the ancient guilt trip placed on people to make them subservient.
Yet many experiments show that alcoholics don’t have control simply because they think they have no control.
Studies also show that ethanol is not a particularly “addictive” substance, nor could it rightly be considered an “allergen.”
Yet this addiction-allergy idea, born from a cult, has been co-opted by some naturopaths.
This has become their lazy way to explain all cigarette, coffee, and food addictions of every type.
“For example, if someone is allergic to grapefruit, they might feel that they must have it every morning, [or suffer] a headache or [a variety of] possible withdrawal symptoms…”
Besides sounding improbable, this is a bastardization of the meaning of the word “allergen.”
The best authorities on allergens contend that to be an allergen, a substance must be a protein or mostly protein.
This is because only long peptides can elicit antibodies – a prerequisite for a true allergy.
Brewed coffee, tobacco smoke, and vodka are essentially protein-free.
The low amounts of free amino acids and polypeptides they contain are far too short to elicit antibodies.
So most “allergies” are actually a chemical intolerance, contact sensitivity, a drug, a poison, a strong oxidant, etc…
Yet, most foods do have proteins that people definitely have antibodies against.
Should these antibodies also bind to a protein in the host, they are then termed “autoantibodies.”
Yet autoantibodies do have an affinity for the antigen that has elicited them and they bind it more strongly than the host.
This affinity makes the immunogenic food the most effective way to neutralize them.
So eating the food, the peptide antigen, would actually be expected to cause a reduction in autoimmune symptoms.
These symptoms can be extreme. But in most cases, they are quite mild.
Even the dangerous autoimmune diseases caused by antibodies – such as myasthenia gravis, type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and cerebral folate deficiency – all lie on a spectrum.
There are likely millions of subclinical cases of these autoimmune conditions.
That uncomfortable feeling a person gets after withdrawing from a particular food could be the result of autoantibodies starting to bind their own proteins (e.g. receptors, enzymes, structural) as the concentration of the food antigen drops.
After autoantibodies bind to the host, they become an attack beacon for immune cells.
The pancreatic beta cells in type I diabetes are destroyed in this manner.
That feeling of relief after eating an “allergenic” food could come from the neutralization of autoantibodies.
That would promote its continued consumption via positive reinforcement.
And that lends the word “addiction” to the syndrome.
In myasthenia gravis, autoantibodies bind acetylcholine receptors leading to a form of partial paralysis.
Autoantibodies that bind to acetylcholine receptors can also explain withdrawal.
After all, nicotine works on acetylcholine receptors and we all know what happens there.
Cerebral folate deficiency is often caused by autoantibodies binding and then blocking folate receptors on the blood-brain barrier.
Upon re-ingesting the “allergenic” food, its proteins could bind and neutralize circulating autoantibodies.
This to reduce folate receptor blocking, permit uptake, and could lead to a period of clarity.
Conversely, confusion may set in as food antigen levels fall.
And that would lead to a greater amount of unbound autoantibodies in the blood available for receptor-blocking.
This could cause confusion when attempting to abstain from the “allergenic” food.
Eating the allergenic food is analogous to “peptide therapy” except that the protein is being eaten and not injected.
Peptide therapy has been shown to work, just as you would expect, through introducing a synthetic neutralizing peptide.
And yet, the single most powerful autoantibody-binding agent remains the very antigen that originally made it:
This means that no other food or drug would be a fully acceptable substitute.
Unless, of course, peptides identical to the food antigen are mainlined:
This single study proves the entire mechanism underlying the true cases of the allergy-addiction syndrome.
These scientists purchased “lupus” rat strains that reliably reproduce lupus-type autoantibodies.
These antibodies are directed against the rat’s nucleosomes, cell structures found in the nucleus consisting of DNA wrapped around histones.
Then they injected long peptides synthesized to match the rats’ histones.
These peptides are identical to the proteins normally attacked by their autoantibodies – so we can assume they bind and neutralize them.
Since the peptides used were identical to natural histone fragments found in rats, they would be non-immunogenic and would not elicit any additional antibodies.
These injections greatly reduced serum antibody levels, determined two weeks after the final injection:
The injected peptides were cognate proteins of the autoantibodies, so they would definitely bind and neutralize them in the bloodstream.
I think it’s fair to assume that these peptides would work the same regardless of how they get into the bloodstream, whether injected or ingested.
The results of this study would apply to some food-based autoimmune syndromes, differing only in autoantibody target and route of administration.
The lowered autoantibody levels reported certainly were not due to a lack of antibody production – they occurred despite enhanced antibody production.
The postmortem B-cells of the peptide-treated groups could produce more autoantibodies, in vitro, than the control rats:
It certainly appears the injected peptides neutralized many circulating autoantibodies, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the rats’ B-cells over the control rats.
Since the B-cells of treated rats were better at making antibodies, reduced autoantibody numbers can only be explained by direct neutralization.
This also explains food tolerance because continued consumption of an allergenic food perpetually induces the neutralization of antibodies previously produced against it.
It’s all quite straightforward. Autoantibodies are formed in some and not others due primarily to absorption levels.
That means things like stomach pH, intestinal permeability, enzyme expression, and food matrix effects.
They all play a leading role in whether a peptide gets absorbed in a long form.
For instance: Sourdough bread is safer than other bread because it uses bacteria in its fermentation, not yeast.
The bacterial species used, Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis, contains enzymes that baker’s yeast does not.
Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis radically lowers bread immunogenicity by breaking down wheat gliadins.
So choosing exclusively sourdough bread should greatly lower the risk of type I diabetes, a condition caused by a long wheat peptide.
And choosing non-homogenized milk is also be safer, but for a different reason.
The process of homogenization increases immunogenicity by encapsulating milk proteins inside tiny liposomes. This has been proven.
Many other so-called “allergens” are more properly called chemicals and can more realistically be explained in other ways.
For instance: Orange oil is a common “contact allergen.”
But it contains high concentrations of geraniol and citral.
These terpenes are two of the most potent antifungals in nature.
“Although most reported cases of citrus peel allergy are due to d-limonene, for our patient, reactions to patch tests for geraniol and citral…”
Perhaps a more realistic explanation is that orange oil simply destroys skin fungi in people infected, which only then induces an immune response.
In this case, it would be the fungal protein(s) then released that would be the true allergen(s).
Some so-called pseudo-allergens cause mast cells to degranulate, releasing histamine and prostaglandin D2 in the process.
This is another example of an apparent allergy that isn’t – making it a pseudo-allergy.
Some foods also contain exorphins – or opiate peptides – and they can be convincingly argued as being addictive for this reason.
Exorphins have been detected in soy, milk, and wheat.
But this cannot explain the problems people have with things like corn, almonds, and oats.
And, of course, tobacco, coffee, and ethanol cannot in any way be considered allergens under any circumstance.
———Important Message———-
When I want my wife to get horny, this is what I do (and it works for single guys too)
Today’s story comes from Steve who is 68. Steve travels 4 days a week in his consulting job.
Steve visits the local parks. He told me that for several days now, he sees this 70-something man doing these unique stretches in the middle of an open field. Obviously taking care of his body – I call him Stretch Man.
Steve watches.
One very attractive blonde, maybe 22, comes up to Stretch Man and chats him up…
Then a gorgeous young brunette carrying a yoga matt approaches Stretch Man and they’re talking… And then they’re exchanging numbers.
Wow. What’s with this guy? How is he magnetically getting these girls?
So Steve talks to the guy when he’s done. He approaches Stretch Man. “Excuse me, but I couldn’t help but notice all these girls coming up to you.”
Stretch Man laughs. “Oh, yeah. Well,” he shifts his weight and looks to the ground. “Every day it’s the same. Different girls, different days.” Then he laughs.
Stretch Man isn’t the only one. This works for married men who want their wife to be aroused again. It works for single guys. It works for everyone, even men who are 100 years old, as you can see here…
—————————-
Leave a Reply